Journal Home
Search for

Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages 1302-1310 (September 2008)


View previous. 13 of 32 View next.

Safety and Efficacy of CT-guided Percutaneous Cryoablation for Renal Cell Carcinoma

Christos S. Georgiades, MD, PhDaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Kelvin Hong, MDa, Cary Bizzell, MDa, Jean-Francois Geschwind, MDa, Ronald Rodriguez, MD, PhDb

Received 29 October 2007; received in revised form 13 May 2008; accepted 19 May 2008. published online 11 July 2008.

Purpose

Image-guided percutaneous cryoablation is a treatment alternative for selected patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The objective of the present study was to present the safety and efficacy of percutaneous cryoablation.

Materials and Methods

The study included 51 lesions in 46 consecutive patients treated with computed tomography (CT)–guided percutaneous cryoablation. Results were based on 40 RCCs with follow-up. Patients had baseline history and physical and laboratory examinations and renal CT or magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and were followed every 3 months. Biopsy of all lesions was performed before or at the time of the procedure. Efficacy was defined as a complete lack of enhancement on follow-up contrast agent–enhanced CT or MR imaging. Lesion size was also followed and correlated with lack of enhancement. Short- and long-term complications were tabulated.

Results

The technical success rate was 100%, with 20% of cases requiring some form of thermal protection of an adjacent organ. During follow-up (median, 28 weeks; range, 4–81 weeks), the efficacy rate was 100% for lesions smaller than 7 cm. The incidence of significant complications was 18% (8% CTAE), mostly (10%) intercostal or genitofemoral nerve injury. All patients with complications recovered fully, and there were no mortalities. There was no change in creatinine levels, and no patient developed renal failure as a result of cryoablation.

Conclusions

CT-guided percutaneous cryoablation resulted in complete response for lesions as large as 4 cm. It may also be a viable alternative for nonsurgical candidates with lesions as large as 7 cm. It has a high efficacy rate, and its modest complications are not only comparable to those of other treatment modalities, but also appear to be reversible.

a Department of Vascular Interventional Radiology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, 600 North Wolfe Street, Blalock 544, Baltimore, MD 21287

b Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, 600 North Wolfe Street, Blalock 544, Baltimore, MD 21287

Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to C.S.G.

 R.R. received a one-time unrestricted grant from Endocare, Irvine, California. None of the other authors have a conflict of interest.

PII: S1051-0443(08)00509-5

doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2008.05.015


View previous. 13 of 32 View next.