Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
Volume 20, Issue 2 , Pages 225-234, February 2009

Laser Ablation of Liver Metastases from Colorectal Cancer with MR Thermometry: 5-Year Survival

Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Neuroradiology, Ernst Moritz Arndt University, Friedrich-Loeffler-Strasse 23a, 17487 Greifswald, Germany

Received 10 December 2007; received in revised form 17 October 2008; accepted 20 October 2008. published online 24 December 2008.

Purpose

To determine technical success, technique effectiveness, complications, and survival after laser ablation of liver metastases from colorectal cancer.

Materials and Methods

Eighty-seven consecutive patients (65 men and 22 women; mean age, 62.8 years) with 180 liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma were included between 1998 and 2005. They underwent laser ablation with magnetic resonance (MR) thermometry in 170 sessions. Indications for laser ablation were locally unresectable tumors (16.1%), metastases in both liver lobes (34.5%), and refusal of surgery and/or general contraindications to surgery (49.4%). Technical success, technique effectiveness, and complication and survival rates were evaluated retrospectively.

Results

Technical success was achieved in 178 of 180 sessions (99%). Follow-up after 24–48 hours demonstrated an effectiveness rate of 85.6%. Local tumor progression rate was 10% after 6 months. Major complications included large pleural effusion, large subcapsular hematoma, abscess, large pneumothorax, pleuritis with fever, intrahepatic hemorrhage, and biloma. Mean survival from the time of diagnosis of the primary tumor was 50.6 months for all patients treated (95% CI, 44.9–56.3 months). Median survival time was 54 months and survival rates were 95.7% at 1 year, 86.2% at 2 years, 72.4% at 3 years, 50.1% at 4 years, and 33.4% at 5 years. The mean survival time after the first treatment was 31.1 months (95% CI, 26.9–35.3 months).

Conclusions

Laser ablation of liver metastases of colorectal cancer with MR thermometry appears safe and efficacious. Although the results are encouraging, direct comparison with other ablative modalities in a prospective clinical trial would be necessary to definitely show one modality is superior.

Abbreviation: RF, radiofrequency

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 None of the authors have identified a conflict of interest.

PII: S1051-0443(08)00933-0

doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2008.10.018

Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
Volume 20, Issue 2 , Pages 225-234, February 2009