Journal Home
Search for

Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages 451-454 (March 2007)


View previous. 28 of 36 View next.

Uterine Artery Embolization: A Treatment Option for Symptomatic Fibroids in Postmenopausal Women

Howard B. Chrisman, MD, Jeet Minocha, MDCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Robert K. Ryu, MD, Robert L. Vogelzang, MD, Paul Nikolaidis, MD, Reed A. Omary, MD

Received 26 July 2006; received in revised form 8 December 2006; accepted 20 December 2006.

The authors tested the hypothesis that UAE is an effective treatment option in postmenopausal women with fibroid-related bulk symptoms. The authors retrospectively reviewed a prospectively acquired HI-IQ database. Between 2001 and 2004, 24 women with an average age of 52 years meeting the Stages of Reproductive Aging Workshop criteria for menopause underwent UAE for fibroid-related bulk symptoms. All patients underwent preprocedural gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging to confirm the presence of fibroid disease and exclude other pathology. These patients were followed at 1-, 3-, 6-, 12-, and 24-month intervals to assess their clinical response to therapy. Clinical success was defined as a qualitative reduction in bulk symptoms. Postprocedural gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging was performed routinely between 3 and 6 months and at 12 or 24 months, if indicated. Technical success was achieved in 24 of 24 (100%) patients. The follow-up period ranged from 1 to 24 months with an average of 9 months. Clinical success was achieved in 22 of 24 (92%) women. There were no major complications in any of the patients. Mean uterine volume was reduced by 564 cc (P < .0001). Mean dominant uterine fibroid volume was reduced by 180 cm3 (P = .0015). Uterine artery embolization is a viable treatment option in carefully selected postmenopausal women with fibroid-related bulk symptoms.

Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, 676 North St. Clair Street, Suite 800, Chicago, IL 60611-2927.

Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to J.M.

 None of the authors have identified a conflict of interest.

PII: S1051-0443(06)00782-2

doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2006.12.723


View previous. 28 of 36 View next.