Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
Volume 19, Issue 1 , Pages 72-79 , January 2008

Comparative Evaluation of Noninvasive Compression Adjuncts for Hemostasis in Percutaneous Arterial, Venous, and Arteriovenous Dialysis Access Procedures

  • David S. Wang, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego Medical Center, 200 West Arbor Dr, San Diego, CA 92103
    • ,
  • Larry F. Chu, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anesthesia, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif.
    • ,
  • Scott E. Olson, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego Medical Center, 200 West Arbor Dr, San Diego, CA 92103
    • ,
  • Frank J. Miller, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego Medical Center, 200 West Arbor Dr, San Diego, CA 92103
    • ,
  • Karim Valji, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego Medical Center, 200 West Arbor Dr, San Diego, CA 92103
    • ,
  • Wade H. Wong, DO

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego Medical Center, 200 West Arbor Dr, San Diego, CA 92103
    • ,
  • Steven C. Rose, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego Medical Center, 200 West Arbor Dr, San Diego, CA 92103
    • ,
  • Matthew Austin, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego Medical Center, 200 West Arbor Dr, San Diego, CA 92103
    • ,
  • Michael D. Kuo, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego Medical Center, 200 West Arbor Dr, San Diego, CA 92103
    • M.D.K. has consulted for Biolife.
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to M.D.K.

Received 14 June 2007 ,Revised 11 August 2007 ,Accepted 14 August 2007.

References 

  1. Kresowik TF, Khoury MD, Miller BV, et al. A prospective study of the incidence and natural history of femoral vascular complications after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. J Vasc Surg. 1991;13:328–333
  2. Hessel SJ, Adams DF, Abrams HL. Complications of angiography. Radiology. 1981;138:273–281
  3. Nasser TK, Mohler ER, Wilensky RL, Hathaway DR. Peripheral vascular complications following coronary interventional procedures. Clin Cardiol. 1995;18:609–614
  4. Oweida SW, Roubin GS, Smith RB, Salam AA. Postcatheterization vascular complications associated with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. J Vasc Surg. 1990;12:310–315
  5. Seldinger SI. Catheter replacement of the needle in percutaneous arteriography; a new technique. Acta Radiol. 1953;39:368–376
  6. Kandarpa K, Aruny JE. Peripheral arteriography: general principles. Handbook of Interventional Radiologic Procedures. 3rd ed.. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001;
  7. Hoffer EK, Bloch RD. Percutaneous arterial closure devices. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003;14:865–885
  8. Koreny M, Riedmuller E, Nikfardjam M, Siostrzonek P, Mullner M. Arterial puncture closing devices compared with standard manual compression after cardiac catheterization: systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2004;291:350–357
  9. Ammann P, Brunner-La Rocca HP, Angehrn W, Roelli H, Sagmeister M, Rickli H. Procedural complications following diagnostic coronary angiography are related to the operator’s experience and the catheter size. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2003;59:13–18
  10. Aguirre FV, Topol EJ, Ferguson JJ, et al. Bleeding complications with the chimeric antibody to platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa integrin in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (EPIC Investigators). Circulation. 1995;91:2882–2890
  11. Kahn ZM, Kumar M, Hollander G, Frankel R. Safety and efficacy of the Perclose suture-mediated closure device after diagnostic and interventional catheterizations in a large consecutive population. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2002;55:8–13
  12. Hermiller JB, Simonton C, Hinohara T, et al. The StarClose Vascular Closure System: interventional results from the CLIP study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006;68:677–683
  13. Ansel G, Yakubov S, Neilsen C, et al. Safety and efficacy of staple-mediated femoral arteriotomy closure: results from a randomized multicenter study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006;67:546–553
  14. Michalis LK, Rees MR, Patsouras D, et al. A prospective randomized trial comparing the safety and efficacy of three commercially available closure devices (Angioseal, Vasoseal and Duett). Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2002;25:423–429
  15. Sanborn TA, Gibbs HH, Brinker JA, Knopf WD, Kosinksi EJ, Roubin GS. A multicenter randomized trial comparing a percutaneous collagen hemostasis device with conventional manual compression after diagnostic angiography and angioplasty. J Invasive Cardiol. 1999;11(suppl B):6B–13B
  16. Katz SG, Abando A. The use of closure devices. Surg Clin North Am. 2004;84:1267–1280vi
  17. Kim MC. Vascular closure devices. Cardiol Clin. 2006;24:277–286vii
  18. Nikolsky E, Mehran R, Halkin A, et al. Vascular complications associated with arteriotomy closure devices in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary procedures: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44:1200–1209
  19. Dangas G, Mehran R, Kokolis S, et al. Vascular complications after percutaneous coronary interventions following hemostasis with manual compression versus arteriotomy closure devices. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;38:638–641
  20. Sohail MR, Khan AH, Holmes DR, Wilson WR, Steckelberg JM, Baddour LM. Infectious complications of percutaneous vascular closure devices. Mayo Clin Proc. 2005;80:1011–1015
  21. Carere RG, Webb JG, Miyagishima R, Djurdev O, Ahmed T, Dodek A. Groin complications associated with collagen plug closure of femoral arterial puncture sites in anticoagulated patients. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1998;43:124–129
  22. Hirsch JA, Reddy SA, Capasso WE, Linfante I. Non-invasive hemostatic closure devices: ”patches and pads”. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003;6:92–95
  23. Nader RG, Garcia JC, Drushal K, Pesek T. Clinical evaluation of SyvekPatch in patients undergoing interventional, EPS and diagnostic cardiac catheterization procedures. J Invasive Cardiol. 2002;14:305–307
  24. Palmer BL, Gantt DS, Lawrence ME, Rajab MH, Dehmer GJ. Effectiveness and safety of manual hemostasis facilitated by the SyvekPatch with one hour of bedrest after coronary angiography using six-French catheters. Am J Cardiol. 2004;93:96–97
  25. Balzer JO, Schwarz W, Thalhammer A, Eichler K, Schmitz-Rixen T, Vogl TJ. Postinterventional percutaneous closure of femoral artery access sites using the Clo-Sur PAD device: initial findings. Eur Radiol. 2006;17:693–700
  26. Mlekusch W, Dick P, Haumer M, Sabeti S, Minar E, Schillinger M. Arterial puncture site management after percutaneous transluminal procedures using a hemostatic wound dressing (Clo-Sur P.A.D.) versus conventional manual compression: a randomized controlled trial. J Endovasc Ther. 2006;13:23–31
  27. Alter BM.Noninvasive hemostasis pad. Endovascular Today 2005; April:60.
  28. Fischer TH, Connolly R, Thatte HS, Schwaitzberg SS. Comparison of structural and hemostatic properties of the poly-N-acetyl glucosamine Syvek Patch with products containing chitosan. Microsc Res Tech. 2004;63:168–174
  29. Hallak OK, Cubeddu RJ, Griffith RA, Reyes BJ. The use of the D-STAT(R) dry bandage for the control of vascular access site bleeding: a multicenter experience in 376 patients. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2007;30:593–600
  30. Elian D, Guetta V, Alcalai R, Lotan C, Segev A. Early mobilization after diagnostic cardiac catheterization with the use of a hemostatic bandage containing thrombin. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2006;7:61–63
  31. Food and Drug Administration. D-Stat dry hemostatic bandage 510(k) summary. October 6, 2006. www.fda.gov/cdrh/pdf6/K061219.pdfAccessed May 6, 2007
  32. Patterson JA. Biolife, L.L.C, assignee (Method for applying a blood clotting agent). US patent US006521265B1. 2003;February 18
  33. Sacks D, Marinelli DL, Martin LG, Spies JB. Reporting standards for clinical evaluation of new peripheral arterial revascularization devices. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003;14:S395–S404
  34. Medtronic, Inc. Medtronic acquires Angiolink Corporation, maker of wound closure device for vascular procedures. 11/04/2004 http://wwwp.medtronic.com/Newsroom/NewsReleaseDetails.do?itemId=1100707169519&lang=en_USAccessed 05/05/2007
  35. Carey D, Martin JR, Moore CA, Valentine MC, Nygaard TW. Complications of femoral artery closure devices. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2001;52:3–7
  36. Mylonas I, Sakata Y, Salinger M, Sanborn TA, Feldman T. The use of percutaneous suture-mediated closure for the management of 14 French femoral venous access. J Invasive Cardiol. 2006;18:299–302

PII: S1051-0443(07)01138-4

doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2007.08.028

Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
Volume 19, Issue 1 , Pages 72-79 , January 2008

Article Tools