Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
Volume 19, Issue 2 , Pages 163-165, February 2008

Secondary Aortoenteric Fistula after Endovascular Aortic Interventions: A Systematic Literature Review

  • David Bergqvist, MD, PhD, FRCS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgical Sciences, Section of Vascular Surgery, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala SE 751 85, Sweden
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to D.B.
  • ,
  • Martin Björck, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgical Sciences, Section of Vascular Surgery, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala SE 751 85, Sweden
  • ,
  • Rickard Nyman, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala SE 751 85, Sweden.

Received 10 April 2007; received in revised form 5 October 2007; accepted 8 October 2007.

Purpose

To evaluate the collective incidence of, and experience with, aortoenteric fistula after endovascular aortoiliac therapy.

Materials and Methods

A systematic literature research was performed to identify cases of aortoenteric fistulation after aortic stent-graft procedures or stent implantation.

Results

The review revealed 16 cases of aortoenteric fistulation after aortic stent-grafting (n = 15) or stent placement (n = 1), in 14 patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm. Six had undergone endovascular aneurysm repair because of what was considered a “hostile abdomen.” The symptoms did not differ from those in patients with arterioenteric fistulation after open aortic repair. A defect in the stent-graft or its function was the predominant cause of fistulation. One fistula was diagnosed at autopsy, two patients died perioperatively, and 13 survived with in situ repair or an axillobifemoral graft, all after removal of the stent-graft or stent. However, the follow-up time was short, longer than 1 year in only five of the 13 survivors.

Conclusions

Aortoenteric fistulation does occur after endovascular implantation of stents and stent-grafts. The incidence is unknown but is probably low. Follow-up time in most publications was less than 1 year, which is considered short to assess potential graft infection.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Support for this study was received from the Swedish Research Council. None of the authors have identified a conflict of interest.

PII: S1051-0443(07)01371-1

doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2007.10.013

Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
Volume 19, Issue 2 , Pages 163-165, February 2008