Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
Volume 17, Issue 9 , Pages 1489-1498, September 2006

Patient Doses from Noncardiac Diagnostic and Therapeutic Interventional Procedures

  • Ioannis A. Tsalafoutas, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Medical Physics Department, “Konstantopoulio-Agia Olga” Hospital, Athens, Greece
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to I.A.T., 158 Kolokotroni, 162 31, Byronas, Athens, Greece
  • ,
  • Helen Goni, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Agios Savvas Hospital; Medical Physics Unit, “Konstantopoulio-Agia Olga” Hospital, Athens, Greece
  • ,
  • Petros N. Maniatis, MD

      Affiliations

    • “Laiko” Hospital; and Computed Tomography Department, “Konstantopoulio-Agia Olga” Hospital, Athens, Greece
  • ,
  • Paris Pappas, MD

      Affiliations

    • Radiology Department, “Konstantopoulio-Agia Olga” Hospital, Athens, Greece
  • ,
  • Nick Bouzas, MD

      Affiliations

    • Radiology Department, “Konstantopoulio-Agia Olga” Hospital, Athens, Greece
  • ,
  • George Tzortzis, MD

      Affiliations

    • Radiology Department, “Konstantopoulio-Agia Olga” Hospital, Athens, Greece

Received 2 February 2006; received in revised form 15 May 2006 and 1 June 2006; accepted 5 June 2006.

PURPOSE

To determine the patient doses during noncardiac diagnostic and therapeutic interventional procedures carried out in a dedicated angiographic unit.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

For 1,214 interventional procedures, the technique type, dose–area product (DAP), cumulative dose (CD), and fluoroscopy time were recorded. These procedures were classified into 23 categories (10 diagnostic and 13 therapeutic) that included nine to 259 patients each. For each category, descriptive statistical analysis was used to determine the characteristics of DAP, CD, and fluoroscopy time distributions. The statistical significance of the differences observed between categories in terms of DAP was assessed.

RESULTS

For the 23 categories studied, the median DAP values ranged from 0.2 to 176.8 Gycm 2. In comparison with the literature, the mean and median DAP values in this study were within reported ranges for eight categories, greater for three, and less for six, whereas for the remaining six categories no relevant data were found in the literature.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the results of this survey indicate that the techniques used by the interventionalists, the operation skills of radiation technologists, and the performance of the x-ray unit present no obvious deficiencies in terms of patient radiation protection. However, for those procedures in which lower DAP values were found in the literature, it should be further investigated whether patient doses could be reduced without degradation of the diagnostic and therapeutic outcomes.

Abbreviations:  CD, cumulative dose , DAP, dose–area product , ESD, entrance skin dose

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 None of the authors have identified a conflict of interest.

PII: S1051-0443(07)60931-2

doi:10.1097/01.RVI.0000233526.17393.E4

Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
Volume 17, Issue 9 , Pages 1489-1498, September 2006