Creative Options for Large Sheath Access during Aortic Endografting
Received 8 December 2007; received in revised form 15 January 2008; accepted 15 January 2008.
Access-related limitations, namely small-caliber vessels and tortuous or calcified stenotic vessels, are often encountered during endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and thoracic EVAR (TEVAR). Overcoming these limitations often requires the creation of a conduit through which the endovascular devices can be delivered. If these limitations are not recognized and respected preoperatively, significant morbidity and mortality may ensue because access-related complications are often addressed in emergent and chaotic situations. There are a variety of conduits described in the literature, each with their own advantages and disadvantages. The present report explores the use of conduits during EVAR and TEVAR by discussing the current literature, and the authors also describe a preferred method to address unfavorable iliac anatomy through the use of endoconduits.
aDivision of Vascular Surgery, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, 3635 Vista Boulevard, St. Louis, MO 63110
bDivision of Vascular Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Address correspondence to B.G.P.
J.S.M. receives research grant support and serves as a consultant or training director for the following companies: Abbott (North Chicago, IL), Abraxis BioScience (New York, NY), Bard (Tempe, AZ), Cook (Bloomington, IN), Cordis (Warren, NJ), ev3 (Golden Valley, MN), Lumen (Plymouth, MN), Medtronic (Santa Rosa, CA), and W.L. Gore & Associates (Flagstaff, AZ).