Journal Home
Search for

Volume 19, Issue 6, Supplement, Pages S22-S26 (June 2008)


View previous. 9 of 16 View next.

Creative Options for Large Sheath Access during Aortic Endografting

Brian G. Peterson, MDaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Jon S. Matsumura, MDb

Received 8 December 2007; received in revised form 15 January 2008; accepted 15 January 2008.

Access-related limitations, namely small-caliber vessels and tortuous or calcified stenotic vessels, are often encountered during endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and thoracic EVAR (TEVAR). Overcoming these limitations often requires the creation of a conduit through which the endovascular devices can be delivered. If these limitations are not recognized and respected preoperatively, significant morbidity and mortality may ensue because access-related complications are often addressed in emergent and chaotic situations. There are a variety of conduits described in the literature, each with their own advantages and disadvantages. The present report explores the use of conduits during EVAR and TEVAR by discussing the current literature, and the authors also describe a preferred method to address unfavorable iliac anatomy through the use of endoconduits.

a Division of Vascular Surgery, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, 3635 Vista Boulevard, St. Louis, MO 63110

b Division of Vascular Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.

Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to B.G.P.

 J.S.M. receives research grant support and serves as a consultant or training director for the following companies: Abbott (North Chicago, IL), Abraxis BioScience (New York, NY), Bard (Tempe, AZ), Cook (Bloomington, IN), Cordis (Warren, NJ), ev3 (Golden Valley, MN), Lumen (Plymouth, MN), Medtronic (Santa Rosa, CA), and W.L. Gore & Associates (Flagstaff, AZ).

PII: S1051-0443(08)00215-7

doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2008.01.031


View previous. 9 of 16 View next.