« Previous
Next »
Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
Volume 20, Issue 6
, Pages 752-759
, June 2009
Radiofrequency Endovenous ClosureFAST versus Laser Ablation for the Treatment of Great Saphenous Reflux: A Multicenter, Single-blinded, Randomized Study (RECOVERY Study)
References
- . Neovascularisation is the principal cause of varicose vein recurrence: results of a randomized trial of stripping the long saphenous vein. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1996;12:442–445
- . Causes of varicose vein recurrence: late results of a randomized controlled trial of stripping the long saphenous vein. J Vasc Surg. 2004;40:634–639
- . Stripping the long saphenous vein reduces the rate of reoperation for recurrent varicose veins: five-year results of a randomized trial. J Vasc Surg. 1999;29:589–592
- . Surgery and sclerotherapy in the treatment of varicose veins: a randomized trial. Arch Surg. 1974;109:793–796
- . Closure of the greater saphenous vein with endoluminal radiofrequency preliminary 6-month follow-up. Dermatol Surg. 2000;26:452–456
- Endovenous obliteration versus conventional stripping operation in the treatment of primary varicose veins: a randomized controlled trial with comparison of the costs. J Vasc Surg. 2002;35:958–965
- Prospective randomized study of endovenous radiofrequency obliteration (closure procedure) versus ligation and stripping in a selected patient population (EVOLVeS Study). J Vasc Surg. 2003;38:207–214
- Prospective randomised study of endovenous radiofrequency obliteration (Closure) versus ligation and vein stripping (EVOLVeS): two-year follow-up. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2005;29:67–73
- Radiofrequency obliteration, invagination or cryo stripping: which is the best tolerated treatment by the patients?. Phlebologie. 2005;34:19–24
- A prospective randomized controlled trial of VNUS Closure versus surgery for the treatment of recurrent long saphenous varicose veins. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2006;31:212–218
- . Long-term outcomes of endovenous radiofrequency obliteration of saphenous reflux as a treatment for superficial venous insufficiency. J Vasc Surg. 2005;42:502–509
- . Endovenous laser treatment of saphenous vein reflux: long-term results. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003;14:991–996
- Endovenous treatment of the greater saphenous vein with a 940 nm diode laser: thrombotic occlusion after endoluminal thermal damage by laser generated steam bubbles. J Vasc Surg. 2002;35:729–736
- . Systematic review of endovenous laser treatment for varicose veins. Br J Surg. 2005;92:1189–1194
- . Infrequent early recanalization of greater saphenous vein after endovenous laser treatment. J Vasc Surg. 2003;38:511–516
- Endovenous laser treatment of the incompetent greater saphenous vein. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2001;12:1167–1171
- . Outcome of different endovenous laser wavelengths for great saphenous vein ablation. J Vasc Surg. 2006;43:88–93
- . Venous severity scoring: an adjunct to venous outcome assessment. J Vasc Surg. 2000;31:1307–1312
- . Construction and validation of a quality of life questionnaire in chronic lower limb venous insufficiency (CIVIQ). Qual Life Res. 1996;5:539–554
- . Radiofrequency ablation and laser ablation in the treatment of varicose veins. Ann Vasc Surg. 2006;20:547–552
- . Saphenous ablation: what are the choices, laser or RF energy?. Semin Vasc Surg. 2005;18:15–18
- . Greater energy delivery improves treatment success of endovenous laser treatment of incompetent saphenous veins. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2004;15:1061–1063
- . Prospective evaluation of higher energy great saphenous vein endovenous laser treatment. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2005;16:791–794
- . Reduced recanalization rates of the great saphenous vein after endovenous laser treatment with increased energy dosing: definition of a threshold for the endovenous fluence equivalent. J Vasc Surg. 2006;44:834–839
- . Endovenous laser treatment of saphenous vein reflux: how much energy do we need to prevent recanalizations. Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2008;42:141–149
- Treatment of the incompetent great saphenous vein by endovenous radiofrequency powered segmental thermal ablation: first clinical experience. J Vasc Surg. 2008;47:151–156
None of the authors have identified a conflict of interest.
This work was supported by VNUS Medical Technologies (San Jose, California).
PII: S1051-0443(09)00214-0
doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2009.03.008
© 2009 SIR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
Volume 20, Issue 6
, Pages 752-759
, June 2009
