« Previous
Next »
Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
Volume 20, Issue 7,
Supplement
, Pages
S349-S373
, July 2009
Reporting Standards for Carotid Artery Angioplasty and Stent Placement
-
Measurement of carotid stenosis using North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET), European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST), and Common Carotid (CC) methods. All three methods demons
Measurement of carotid stenosis using North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET), European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST), and Common Carotid (CC) methods. All three methods demonstrate a high degree of reproducibility overall. The NASCET method used most frequently in the United States is reliable but tends to underestimate the degree of stenosis. The NASCET ratio should not be applied if there is near-occlusion with reduction in the diameter of the cervical internal carotid artery beyond the stenosis. Such a reduction in the diameter of the internal carotid artery beyond the site of stenosis would consequently underestimate the severity of stenosis. CC and ECST methods grade the stenosis similarly and generally are in agreement. For atherosclerotic disease that narrows the carotid bulb, the percentage difference between NASCET and ECST increases. Carotid stenosis measured at ultrasound tends to correlate better with ECST and CC methods ().
None of the authors have identified a conflict of interest.This article was copublished in the May 2004 issues of Stroke (Stroke 2004;35:e112-e133.) and the Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology. © 2004 American Heart Association, Inc. With permission from the American Heart Association, Inc.
This article first appeared in J Vasc Interv Radiol 2004; 15:E1–E24.
PII: S1051-0443(09)00303-0
doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2009.04.032
© 2009 SIR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
Volume 20, Issue 7,
Supplement
, Pages
S349-S373
, July 2009
