Journal Home
Search for

Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages 357-361 (March 2010)


View previous. 12 of 29 View next.

Percutaneous US-guided Renal Biopsy: A Retrospective Study Comparing the 16-gauge End-cut and 14-gauge Side-notch Needles

Andre Constantin, MDaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Marie-Laure Brisson, MDb, Janet Kwan, MDa, Francesca Proulx, MDa

Received 11 August 2008; received in revised form 18 October 2009; accepted 8 November 2009. published online 03 February 2010.

Purpose

Assess glomerular yield and safety profile of two different types of needles for percutaneous ultrasound-guided kidney biopsy.

Materials and Methods

Over 24 months, 121 ultrasonographic ultrasound-guided renal biopsies were performed on native kidneys of 121 adults: 66 with 16-gauge, 29-mm end-cut (BioPince) needles and 55 with 14-gauge, 1.9-mm side-notch (Tru-Cut) needles.

Results

The mean number of complete glomeruli harvested per biopsy was 21.0 and 19.3, respectively, and the mean number of core samples required to obtain a satisfactory biopsy was 1.8 and 2.6, respectively. The ratio of glomeruli harvested to core samples needed with the end-cut needle was 58% greater than that with the side-notch needles (11.7 vs 7.4, respectively; difference of 4.3; 95% confidence interval: 2.0, 6.8). Procedures performed with end-cut needles were associated with fewer major complications (1.5% vs 7.3% with side-notch needles).

Conclusions

Compared to the 14-g Tru-cut needle, the 16-g end-cut needle provided better glomerular yield per core sample, required fewer cores for satisfactory tissue specimen, and resulted in fewer major complications.

AbbreviationCI, confidence interval

a Department of Radiology, Jewish General Hospital, 3755 Cote-Ste-Catherine, Montreal, Canada H3T 1E2

b Department of Pathology, Jewish General Hospital, 3755 Cote-Ste-Catherine, Montreal, Canada H3T 1E2

Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to A.C.

 None of the authors have identified a conflict of interest.

PII: S1051-0443(09)01137-3

doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2009.11.005


View previous. 12 of 29 View next.